City Council
City Council
Tue, August 4, 2026
Agenda items
Vote records
Discussion summary
Transcript
Meeting summaryAI-generated
Santa Rosa City Council — August 4, 2026
This was a relatively brief and efficient regular City Council meeting, with Councilmembers Fleming and MacDonald absent. The session focused heavily on housing policy, with two substantive items related to state designation and downtown development incentives.
Community Empowerment Plan Update (Item 8.1)
Misty Wood (staff) presented the monthly Community Empowerment Plan update, highlighting several upcoming community events: National Night Out with the Santa Rosa Police and Fire Departments at Dick's Sporting Goods (happening that same evening); a Park-a-Month volunteer event at Rincon Valley Community Park on August 8; a creek cleanup at Prince Memorial Greenway on August 15; a World Cemetery Preservation Committee volunteer day also on August 15; the ongoing "Live at Juilliard" free concert series through August 16; and the restart of District Committee meetings, with the first scheduled for August 26 at Montgomery High School featuring Mayor Stapp, Councilmember MacDonald, and community advisory board members. No action was taken; this is a standing informational item.
City Manager and City Attorney Reports
City Manager (name unclear from transcript) announced three items: a downtown Ross Street activation running August 14 through October 31, featuring food trucks, live music, and family activities; Santa Rosa being named the North Bay's "Most Business Friendly City" in the Best of the North Bay Awards for the second consecutive year (with Mayor Stapp good-naturedly noting it was also the second year Rohnert Park did not win); and Movies in the Park returning on Friday evenings from August 14 through September 11 at Howard Park, with films including *The Little Mermaid*, *Monsters, Inc.*, *Lilo & Stitch*, and *Zootopia 2*. The City Attorney had no report.
Consent Calendar (Items 13.1 and 13.2)
Two consent items were approved without separate discussion:
13.1: Resolution authorizing receipt of additional Community Development Block Grant – Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funds from the California Department of Housing and Community Development, allocated to the Coffey Park area (full title truncated in agenda).
13.2: Resolution extending a Proclamation of Local Emergency (full title truncated in agenda).
One member of the public called in but asked to defer their comment to the non-agenda public comment period at the end of the meeting.
Vote: Motion by Vice Mayor Okrepkie, seconded by Councilmember Alvarez. Passed 5–0 (Fleming and MacDonald absent).
ProHousing Designation Program Application (Item 15.1)
Deputy Director of Planning Jessica Jones and Planner Amy Nicholson presented the city's draft application to renew its ProHousing Designation from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The designation, which expires in January 2027, recognizes cities that go above and beyond on housing policy and rewards them with priority processing and additional competitiveness for state housing grants — including access to a funding pool exclusive to ProHousing-designated jurisdictions.
Santa Rosa first received the designation in 2023, scoring 57 points (above the 30-point minimum). The new draft application scores approximately 89 points — 32 more than last time — which staff projects would rank Santa Rosa second or third among the 74 currently designated jurisdictions statewide, and well above all other Sonoma County jurisdictions. Key policy achievements that contributed to the higher score include: adoption of missing middle housing and tiny homes on wheels ordinances, streamlining of multifamily project review (large projects can now be approved in four months or less), updates to the North Station Area Specific Plan, establishment of the South Santa Rosa Specific Plan, a capital facility fee (CFF) waiver for 100% affordable housing projects, and a 50% permit fee reduction for affordable housing. The city has also directly received $1.25 million in grants tied specifically to the ProHousing designation.
A 30-day public comment period on the draft application is now open.
Council discussion touched on several themes. Councilmember Bañuelos raised concerns about housing for moderate-income residents — people who earn too much to qualify for low-income programs but cannot afford market-rate housing — noting this is where the city has historically struggled to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) targets. Staff acknowledged the challenge, noting developers find moderate-income housing especially difficult to make financially viable. Vice Mayor Okrepkie noted pointedly that cities receive no relief from state housing mandates in return for earning the ProHousing designation. Mayor Stapp asked whether the small exclusive grant pool ($8 million statewide in the last round, of which Santa Rosa received $1.25 million) adequately compensates cities for the substantial policy work required, and whether this issue has been raised with state lobbyists.
Housing authority appointee Gregory Farron spoke during public comment, noting the $1.25 million grant will help fund portions of two low-income housing projects, and encouraged the council to keep an eye on larger state funding pools (such as HOME-ARP) that may begin prioritizing ProHousing cities.
Vote: Motion by Councilmember Rogers, seconded by Councilmember Alvarez. Passed 5–0 (Fleming and MacDonald absent).
High-Density Multi-Family Residential Incentive Program Extension (Item 15.2)
Jessica Jones and Planning Director Gabe Osborne presented a request to extend the city's High-Density Multi-Family Residential Incentive Program for five years, through August 31, 2031. Originally adopted in 2018 and extended in 2022, the program is set to expire at the end of August 2026. It incentivizes high-density downtown housing by reducing capital facility fees and park fees, and deferring water and wastewater fees, for qualifying projects of at least four stories with significant residential square footage in core downtown zoning districts. Projects that include on-site affordable units receive even steeper reductions (fees down to $2 per square foot).
Completed projects that utilized the program include the Cannery, Pullman Lofts, 888 4th Street, and The Felix. Three projects are currently pending under the program: Avenue 3.20 Apartments, the third phase of the Pullman Lofts, and the Humble Street Apartments at 425 Humble. The five-year extension would give staff time to conduct an updated nexus (impact fee) study, engage developers and community members, and ultimately bring a revised program back to council.
Council discussion was substantive. Councilmember Bañuelos again advocated for stronger incentives targeting low- and moderate-income housing, not just market-rate projects. Director Osborne responded that staff intends to bring a comprehensive incentive package discussion to council in a study session toward the end of 2026. Mayor Stapp probed how much impact the fee incentives actually have on development decisions, with Osborne noting that while fees are often cited by developers, construction costs and achievable rents are more decisive factors — and that the CFF waiver for affordable housing, despite being very aggressive, has not yet produced a single development. Stapp also asked whether the city's downtown program has attracted a different, larger class of developer; Osborne confirmed that higher-density downtown development tends to attract institutional developers accustomed to complex urban projects, who are less fee-sensitive and more focused on long-term asset holding.
Gregory Farron (public comment) cautioned the council not to overlook smaller developers for whom fee deferrals are meaningful. A phone commenter expressed concern about a new 10-bedroom women's clean-living facility under construction on West 3rd at Fulton, saying neighbors were not informed and worried about impacts from the adjacent homeless encampment at Place to Play Park. Staff did not respond to this comment during the item.
Vote: Motion by Councilmember Bañuelos, seconded by Councilmember Rogers. Three resolutions adopted. Passed 5–0 (Fleming and MacDonald absent).
Non-Agenda Public Comment
Four speakers addressed the council:
Constituent (name unclear): Raised concerns about Vice Mayor Okrepkie's past association with the "Act 2030 Club" and Christopher Creek Winery in connection with the ongoing criminal trial of former Windsor Mayor Dominic Foppoli on rape allegations. The speaker also alleged a connection between Okrepkie and the Boys and Girls Club, where she said she is currently litigating on behalf of abuse victims, and noted that a candidate for council has ties to individuals she considers problematic.
John (last name unclear): Spoke about graffiti blight along Highway 101 north of Todd Avenue, on walls adjacent to the new Santa Rosa Apartments, and near the dog care clinic on Steele Lane. He urged the city to take more proactive action on private property blight visible from the freeway. The City Manager acknowledged awareness of the issue and promised staff follow-up.
Brian Fix, Santa Rosa Police Officers Association: Announced that after considerable internal deliberation, the POA is endorsing the Measure Q sales tax measure on the November 2026 ballot. Fix noted the membership was not enthusiastic about the nine percent budget cuts the department absorbed but acknowledged there is no alternative path to fiscal stability without community support for the measure.
Phone commenter (guest 8309): Returned to express concern about the women's clean-living facility under construction on West 3rd, citing neighborhood opposition and asking whether the project could be stopped. Mayor Stapp indicated the project is outside the scope of what the council could address in that setting and directed the caller to contact the city.
Key Takeaways
ProHousing reapplication approved: The city will submit a renewed state ProHousing Designation application scoring an estimated 89 points — up from 57 in 2023 — which could rank Santa Rosa second or third statewide and unlock priority access to state housing grants.
Downtown housing fee incentive program extended five years: The High-Density Multi-Family Residential Incentive Program, which has helped deliver projects like The Felix and the Pullman Lofts, will continue through August 2031 while staff develops a comprehensive updated fee and incentive framework.
Moderate-income housing gap acknowledged: Multiple councilmembers and staff flagged that Santa Rosa consistently struggles to meet RHNA targets for moderate-income households, and a broader study session on housing incentives is planned for late 2026.
Police Officers Association endorses Measure Q: The Santa Rosa POA publicly endorsed the November 2026 sales tax measure, a notable development given the department absorbed significant budget cuts during the city's fiscal tightening.
Graffiti and neighborhood concerns surfaced: Residents flagged graffiti blight along Highway 101 and concerns about a new transitional housing facility on West 3rd Street; the City Manager committed to follow up on graffiti but offered no response on the housing facility.
AI-generated summary from voice-to-text transcript. Not the official record. Verify important details with the source documents linked above.
What happened at this meeting
COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT PLAN UPDATE This is a standing item on the agenda. Council will take no action except for possible direction to staff. This item has no impact on current fiscal year budget.
Misty Wood presented the Community Empowerment Plan update for August, highlighting several community events including National Night Out at Dick's Sporting Goods (5-8pm) co-hosted by Santa Rosa Police and Fire Departments, a park volunteer program at Rincon Valley Community Park on August 8, a creek cleanup at Prince Memorial Greenway on August 15, and cemetery preservation volunteer work. Wood also announced the kickoff of district committee meetings, with the first scheduled for August 26 at Montgomery High School (6:30-8pm) featuring Mayor Stapp, Councilmember MacDonald, and community advisory board members. The Mayor thanked Wood for highlighting the police department event and there were no questions from Council members.
RESOLUTION - AUTHORIZATION OF RECEIPT OF ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - DISASTER RECOVERY GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ALLOCATING SUCH FUNDS TO THE COFFEY PARK AND
Staff presented a resolution for Items 13.1 and 13.2 on the consent agenda. No council members raised questions on either item. One member of the public called in via Zoom but deferred their comment to the non-agenda public comment period at the end of the meeting. The motion passed with 5 affirmative votes (Councilmembers Rogers, Fleming, Ben Willows, Vice Mayor Okrepkie, and Mayor Stab voting yes; Councilmember MacDonald absent).
REPORT - PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM APPLICATION
# Summary: REPORT - PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM APPLICATION
Deputy Director Jessica Jones and Amy Nicholson presented Santa Rosa's renewed Pro Housing Designation Program application, which increased from 57 points in 2023 to 89 points—positioning the city in 2nd or 3rd place among 74 designated jurisdictions statewide and substantially above other Sonoma County jurisdictions. Since initial designation, the city has advanced missing middle housing, tiny homes on wheels, streamlined multifamily review processes, and adopted capital facility fee waivers and permit fee reductions for affordable housing projects. Vice Mayor Mike inquired about state-level benefits, and staff explained the city receives priority processing, higher point totals for affordable housing grant competitions, and access to exclusive funding pools; notably, Santa Rosa secured $1.25 million in competitive funding from a statewide $8 million pool and approximately $30 million in total infill infrastructure grants. A council member raised concerns about moderate-income households—those earning too much for low-income housing but unable to afford market-rate housing—noting that specific strategies addressing this income category remain limited. Staff recommended the council authorize submission of the renewal application to maintain the designation expiring in January, pending completion of the public participation process.
Deputy Director Jessica Jones and Amy Nicholson presented Santa Rosa's renewed Pro Housing Designation Program application, which increased from 57 points in 2023 to 89 points—positioning the city in 2nd or 3rd place among 74 designated jurisdictions statewide and substantially above other Sonoma County jurisdictions. Since initial designation, the city has advanced missing middle housing, tiny homes on wheels, streamlined multifamily review processes, and adopted capital facility fee waivers and permit fee reductions for affordable housing projects. Vice Mayor Mike inquired about state-level benefits, and staff explained the city receives priority processing, higher point totals for affordable housing grant competitions, and access to exclusive funding pools; notably, Santa Rosa secured $1.25 million in competitive funding from a statewide $8 million pool and approximately $30 million in total infill infrastructure grants. A council member raised concerns about moderate-income households—those earning too much for low-income housing but unable to afford market-rate housing—noting that specific strategies addressing this income category remain limited. Staff recommended the council authorize submission of the renewal application to maintain the designation expiring in January, pending completion of the public participation process.
REPORT - HIGH-DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE
# Summary
Deputy Director of Planning Jessica Jones presented the High-Density Multi-Family Residential Incentive Program, originally adopted in 2018 to encourage downtown housing development through reductions and deferrals of capital facilities fees, park fees, and water/wastewater fees. Staff recommended a 5-year extension through August 31, 2031, to allow time for an updated nexus fee study, community and developer engagement, and development of a comprehensive incentive package addressing various housing types. Council Member Gregory noted that fee incentives particularly benefit middle-income developers with limited cash flows, while Council Member Rogers emphasized the importance of creating housing variety across all income levels to serve Santa Rosa's diverse population. A public commenter raised concerns about neighborhood impacts of low-income housing facilities, and staff acknowledged the need to focus on making affordable housing projects financially viable while developing an overall approach to impact fees to be discussed in a study session in late fall/early winter.
Deputy Director of Planning Jessica Jones presented the High-Density Multi-Family Residential Incentive Program, originally adopted in 2018 to encourage downtown housing development through reductions and deferrals of capital facilities fees, park fees, and water/wastewater fees. Staff recommended a 5-year extension through August 31, 2031, to allow time for an updated nexus fee study, community and developer engagement, and development of a comprehensive incentive package addressing various housing types. Council Member Gregory noted that fee incentives particularly benefit middle-income developers with limited cash flows, while Council Member Rogers emphasized the importance of creating housing variety across all income levels to serve Santa Rosa's diverse population. A public commenter raised concerns about neighborhood impacts of low-income housing facilities, and staff acknowledged the need to focus on making affordable housing projects financially viable while developing an overall approach to impact fees to be discussed in a study session in late fall/early winter.
NOTICE OF FINAL MAP - Holly Hock - Provided for information.
Council called public attention to Item 17.1, Notice of Final Map, which was provided for information purposes only. No discussion or council action was taken on this item.
Agenda items (12)
Procedural (5)
1ProceduralHTTPS://SANTA-ROSA.LEGISTAR.COM/CALENDAR. CLICK ON THE "IN PROGRESS" LINK TO VIEW;
Instructions for viewing the meeting agenda online through the city's legislative tracking system.
2ProceduralVIA ZOOM WEBINAR BY VISITING
Instructions for attending the meeting remotely via Zoom webinar.
3ProceduralCOMCAST CHANNEL 28 OR 24 (ESPAÑOL), AT&T U-VERSE CHANNEL 99; AND
Instructions for watching the meeting live on local cable television channels.
4ProceduralVIA YOUTUBE AT HTTPS://WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/CITYOFSANTAROSA Public Comment may be made live during the meeting In-Person from Council Chamber, via Zoom webinar or dial-in, or submitted in advance via email at cc-comment@srcity.org by 5:00 p.m. the Monday before the City Council Meeting.
Residents can submit public comments in person, via Zoom, by phone, or by email to cc-comment@srcity.org by 5 p.m. the Monday before the meeting.
21.1ProceduralUPCOMING MEETINGS LIST *Did not appear on the preliminary agenda. **Quasi-judicial or adjudicative action, ex-parte communication disclosure is required. The Open Government Ordinance was adopted by City Council in December 2020 (ORD-2020-018) and amended in July 2021 (ORD-2021-007). These ordinances added and amended Chapter 1-10 to the City Code to codify the City of Santa Rosa's commitment to embrace a culture of open government to ensure public trust, engage the community, and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. To view a full versions of the Open Government Ordinances go to http://srcity.org/OpenGovOrdinance and http://srcity.org/OpenGovOrdinanceAmend. To request paper copies of the Open Government Ordinances contact the City Clerk's Office at 707-543-3015 (TTY Relay at 711) or cityclerk@srcity.org.
A list of upcoming city meetings is being provided for resident information.
General Business
8.1General BusinessCOMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT PLAN UPDATE This is a standing item on the agenda. Council will take no action except for possible direction to staff. This item has no impact on current fiscal year budget.
Council will receive an update on the Community Empowerment Plan and may give staff feedback; no formal action or budget impact is expected.
What happened
Misty Wood presented the Community Empowerment Plan update for August, highlighting several community events including National Night Out at Dick's Sporting Goods (5-8pm) co-hosted by Santa Rosa Police and Fire Departments, a park volunteer program at Rincon Valley Community Park on August 8, a creek cleanup at Prince Memorial Greenway on August 15, and cemetery preservation volunteer work. Wood also announced the kickoff of district committee meetings, with the first scheduled for August 26 at Montgomery High School (6:30-8pm) featuring Mayor Stapp, Councilmember MacDonald, and community advisory board members. The Mayor thanked Wood for highlighting the police department event and there were no questions from Council members.11.1General BusinessMAYOR'S/COUNCIL MEMBERS' SUBCOMMITTEE AND LIAISON REPORTS (AND POSSIBLE COUNCIL DIRECTION TO BOARD REPRESENTATIVE ON PENDING ISSUES, IF NEEDED) 11.1.1 Council Subcommittee Reports 11.1.2 Sonoma County Transportation and Climate Authorities (SCTCA) 11.1.3 Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) - Water Advisory Committee 11.1.4 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) 11.1.5 Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District
Council members will report on activities from various subcommittees and regional agencies they represent, including transportation, water, land-use planning, and open space issues.
15.1General BusinessREPORT - PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM APPLICATION
Staff will present the city's application to the state's ProHousing Designation Program, which aims to streamline housing development.
What happened
# Summary: REPORT - PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM APPLICATIONDeputy Director Jessica Jones and Amy Nicholson presented Santa Rosa's renewed Pro Housing Designation Program application, which increased from 57 points in 2023 to 89 points—positioning the city in 2nd or 3rd place among 74 designated jurisdictions statewide and substantially above other Sonoma County jurisdictions. Since initial designation, the city has advanced missing middle housing, tiny homes on wheels, streamlined multifamily review processes, and adopted capital facility fee waivers and permit fee reductions for affordable housing projects. Vice Mayor Mike inquired about state-level benefits, and staff explained the city receives priority processing, higher point totals for affordable housing grant competitions, and access to exclusive funding pools; notably, Santa Rosa secured $1.25 million in competitive funding from a statewide $8 million pool and approximately $30 million in total infill infrastructure grants. A council member raised concerns about moderate-income households—those earning too much for low-income housing but unable to afford market-rate housing—noting that specific strategies addressing this income category remain limited. Staff recommended the council authorize submission of the renewal application to maintain the designation expiring in January, pending completion of the public participation process.
15.2General BusinessREPORT - HIGH-DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE
Council will discuss an incentive program designed to encourage construction of high-density apartment and multi-family housing projects.
What happened
# SummaryDeputy Director of Planning Jessica Jones presented the High-Density Multi-Family Residential Incentive Program, originally adopted in 2018 to encourage downtown housing development through reductions and deferrals of capital facilities fees, park fees, and water/wastewater fees. Staff recommended a 5-year extension through August 31, 2031, to allow time for an updated nexus fee study, community and developer engagement, and development of a comprehensive incentive package addressing various housing types. Council Member Gregory noted that fee incentives particularly benefit middle-income developers with limited cash flows, while Council Member Rogers emphasized the importance of creating housing variety across all income levels to serve Santa Rosa's diverse population. A public commenter raised concerns about neighborhood impacts of low-income housing facilities, and staff acknowledged the need to focus on making affordable housing projects financially viable while developing an overall approach to impact fees to be discussed in a study session in late fall/early winter.
17.1General BusinessNOTICE OF FINAL MAP - Holly Hock - Provided for information.
Final subdivision map for the Holly Hock development project is provided for council information only.
What happened
Council called public attention to Item 17.1, Notice of Final Map, which was provided for information purposes only. No discussion or council action was taken on this item.Consent Calendar
13.1Consent CalendarRESOLUTION - AUTHORIZATION OF RECEIPT OF ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - DISASTER RECOVERY GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ALLOCATING SUCH FUNDS TO THE COFFEY PARK AND
City is accepting additional disaster recovery grant funds from the state to help rebuild homes in Coffey Park and other neighborhoods affected by wildfires.
What happened
Staff presented a resolution for Items 13.1 and 13.2 on the consent agenda. No council members raised questions on either item. One member of the public called in via Zoom but deferred their comment to the non-agenda public comment period at the end of the meeting. The motion passed with 5 affirmative votes (Councilmembers Rogers, Fleming, Ben Willows, Vice Mayor Okrepkie, and Mayor Stab voting yes; Councilmember MacDonald absent).13.2Consent CalendarRESOLUTION - EXTENSION OF PROCLAMATION OF LOCAL
Council will extend a local emergency proclamation that was previously declared.
Additional votes recorded in minutes
Approve Consent Calendar (Items 13.1 and 13.2)
aye 5 · absent 2
Caroline Bañuelosaye
Dianna MacDonaldabsent
Eddie Alvarezaye
Jeff Okrepkieaye
Mark Stappaye
Natalie Rogersaye
Victoria Flemingabsent
Adopt Resolution RES-2026-093 - Prohousing Designation Program Application Authorization
aye 5 · absent 2
Caroline Bañuelosaye
Dianna MacDonaldabsent
Eddie Alvarezaye
Jeff Okrepkieaye
Mark Stappaye
Natalie Rogersaye
Victoria Flemingabsent
Adopt Resolutions RES-2026-094, RES-2026-095, RES-2026-096 - High-Density Multi-Family Residential Incentive Program
aye 5 · absent 2
Caroline Bañuelosaye
Dianna MacDonaldabsent
Eddie Alvarezaye
Jeff Okrepkieaye
Mark Stappaye
Natalie Rogersaye
Victoria Flemingabsent
Verbatim transcript available
79 transcript segments indexed
>> I'd like to ask interpreter currently on the Spanish Channel to commence interpretation of the meeting for those just joining the meeting meeting live interpretation in Spanish is available and members of the public or staff wishing to listen Spanish can join the Spanish channel by clicking on the interpretation icon and the Zoom toolbar. It looks like a club. You're on your cell phone or tablet locate the 3 dots, top them lightly and put a check mark on your preferred language. Click done to activate and begin the interpretation. Won't you join the Spanish Channel? We recommend that you shut off the main audio. See only here. The Spanish interpretation. Loescher. Will you please restate this in Spanish? >> Yes, thank you. In Jonas. Think that a pedestrian and it's been, you if you beat
that most of fixed and that when you'll think when meet, though, into the media this dominate a whisk with Chad. And think that is Senate's banking on to think went and some comfort, though, to both Kate with that backfield enough. But thinking video this up. But say in that. But this don't they pull the destination that it's York. 6 young if it'll take in a soaps. Same went o Keefe and those who say not not public, that will be key Ito kiddos repeat those cap. But it can end up on yeah. He hit him and people known up underneath and spending on cynics could done effect, if it would come we put day. But you 9 that but this one, this has pushed to put the Stone. It's been good thing. No, no. An experience. Right back at you. >> Welcome everyone. In the Times for one and we can call this meeting or at a city clerk, would you please call
the roll? >> Thank you, Mayor Councilmember Rogers as it Councilmember MacDonald is absent. Councilmember Fleming is absent councilmember Ben Willows here. Councilmember health or as PRESIDENT Vice Mayor Okrepkie here, mayor staff here. Let the record reflect all councilmembers are present with the exception of council members. Fleming and MacDonald. >> Thank you very much. All right. We can jump ahead right away to item 8.1. Our community Empowerment Plan update. >> And we have MISS More this evening. >> Good evening, mayor vice mayor and members of the council. My name is Misty would. And tonight I'll be briefly presenting the community Empowerment Plan update for the month of AUGUST. I'm gonna start out with one of my favorite events
which is happening right now, which is national night out. This is an annual nationwide event to help build police and community relationships. Our Santa Rosa Police Department and fire department are out at Dick's Sporting Goods from 05:00pm to 08:00pm tonight. This is a free family-friendly event and we encourage everybody to attend to get to know our police officers in a very relaxed and fun setting. Next up on AUGUST, 8 recreation and parks will host its annual park a month volunteer program at Rincon Valley Community Park. And that'll be from 09:00am to 12:00pm. So feel free to show up. Bring your friends or show by yourself and meet new people along the way. On AUGUST 15th. We have a creek cleanup hosted by Santa Rosa Water at the Prince Memorial Greenway. Anybody who's interested meet at the all of Park footbridge near 16, 98.
He's a street at 10:00am. This run does require a sign up. So please visit sr City Dot org, slash calendar to sign up for that cleanup. Also in AUGUST, 15th, the World Cemetery Preservation Committee will host their monthly volunteer work day from 09:00am to 12:00pm projects include cemetery beautification effort such as painting and other landscaping projects and maintenance work. Live at Juilliard as happening from JULY 12 to AUGUST 16. So it is still ongoing on Sundays. This is a free up quite a large event at Juilliard, Juilliard Park here in downtown Santa Rosa. Everyone is invited to join and this free celebration for a concert dates and artist lineup and additional details. Visit sr City dot org slash live at Juilliard. And then finally we are kicking off once again, our district, these committee meetings with council members and committee
advisory board members. Our first one is on AUGUST. 26th. This will be with Mayor Stapp Councilmember MacDonald and community advisory board members claim Dalton and Andrea Rodriguez, this will be at Montgomery High School from 6.30, to 08:00pm on AUGUST. 26, this is an opportunity to get to share your feedback. Learn more about how the city works and have direct access to your elected and to community advisory board members. And we will be announcing additional meetings as those are scheduled as well. That concludes this month update. Available for any Council MAY have. >> a full slate as always. Thank you very much. Any questions from council. All right, no questions, but thank you for highlighting the event tonight with the police department. According good standing with us are headed there after the fact I am
well, let's go public comment. For those of you online, remember to raise your hand or dial star 9. So we know you have a comment. Are there any I members of public in council chambers who wish to speak? Seeing none? We'll turn to MADAM Zuma host. Lauren, is there anybody online with their hands raised? >> Negative mayor. >> Alright, we'll close public comment. And Misty, thank you very much for your for your report. We'll move on then to item 9, our city manager and city attorneys Jason, anything from the city manager sign? Yes, yes. Thank you very much. Mayor of a few things to report on. First, I'd like to share an upcoming downtown activation that will help bring energy and activity to the heart of our city from AUGUST 14, through OCTOBER 31st. The Ross Street activation will transform the east side of Ross Street into
a vibrant community gathering place featuring live music lunchtime, food trucks and family-friendly activities designed to attract visitors and support the downtown businesses. The city of Santa Rosa is proud to support this effort through funding partnership and coordination assistance for Economic Development Division. We appreciate the collaboration of our downtown business community and event partners and bringing activation to life in our downtown for more information, please visit downtown Santa Rosa Dot work. I'm also really please and super excited to announce that the city of Santa Rosa has been named the North Bay Business. North Bay's business friendly city in the best of the North Bay Awards. This recognition is especially meaningful because it's that her it's determined by votes from local residents and
businesses, business community reflecting their confidence in Santa Rosa as a place where business can thrive. This honor belongs to our entire community, including the businesses, entrepreneurs, employees and partners who contribute to our local economy every day. It reflects the strong partnership between the city and our business community and reinforces Santa Rosa's reputation as a place where success takes root. We're grateful to employees who voted for to everyone who voted and helped make this recognition possible. Visit sr City dot org forward slash doing business to connect with our team and resources. And I do want to just express a huge congratulations and thank you to all of those who our involved with helping make the business community in Santa Rosa. Really one that's thriving and some place that really demonstrates how
fantastic it is to do work and business here. And lastly, I'd like to invite our community to join for join us for another season of movies in the park taking place this Friday evening. We're every Friday evening from AUGUST 14 through SEPTEMBER, 11th at Howard Park. Families are encouraged to bring a picnic and a blanket and enjoy a free movie under the stars, along with food vendors and pre movie activities, including the train and carousel rides. Lawn games face painting and special entertainment. This year's lineup includes the Little Mermaid. Dog Ban Monsters, incorporated Lilo and Stitch and Zootopia 2 movies begin at dusk and activity start earlier in the evening. Movies in the park is a great opportunity to come together and enjoy one of Santa Rosa's, most beloved parks. We hope to see you there. And for more
information, please visit sr City Dot org forward slash movies in the park. Mayor, that concludes my report. Thank you. City manager driver correctly that this is the second year in a row that Santa Rosa has received a business friendly cities in county. >> You do remember correctly and it's the second year that Rohnert Park did not win that reward. Is that is that correct? Absolutely correct. Just as a matter of record, thank you very much. MADAM City, Attorney. >> Thank you, Mayor. I do not have any reports afternoon. >> Thank you very much for what a public comment. Again, if you're online, raise your hand or Dial Star 9. Are there any members of the public that would like to celebrate Saint Rose of being named the business friendly city in Sonoma County. I see one member of the crew of the
public who happens to be my my mom. Make your way to the podium. I guess I just we were were required to allow this. Oh, thank heavens. Okay. No public comment yet we will turn. And Lauren, anybody online. No celebrants online either. Mayor, thank you very much, Lauren Argo, close public comment will move on. Then to statements of abstention recusal by council members. Are there any statements of abstention recusal this evening? Seeing none were gone to mayor and Councilmember reports. Are there any reports this evening? Ms Rogers kick to kick us off. >> First, I'd just like to say hello to your mother. Too bad. She wasn't here. Last week has been she could have met my mother. So I think we're taken turns on sharing what we do here for the city. I'm excited to point Nadia Keen to arts in public places. Nnadi is a
filmmaker, a photographer, a writer in a substitute teacher for Sonoma County Office of Education. So just like to thank her stepping up and wanting to support the city what we're doing here. Also want to wish Grant Davis from Sonoma Water. A very happy retirement. The whack intact met yesterday Monday, AUGUST 3rd in the past a resolution honoring Grant Davies Hui Sonoma Water's general manager who will be retiring later this month after 19, very long years of so service. He seen us through Zinn droughts and you name it. He seen it. So thank you very much. Grant. For your service. Sonoma Water staff provided an update on water supply, noting that both reservoirs are in good shape due to implementation of forecast and former as a border operations, which is Piro that allowed the Army Corps to store more water over the winter months. Sonoma
water staff provided updates on the Potter Valley Project noting that perk extended the comment period for the environmental scoping a pg e's proposal in the walk-in other water. Contractors have submitted comments >> Where we're last Bill Russian Project Authority or but is meeting this Thursday at noon. >> In the Sonoma County board Chambers >> and then I also had the >> privilege of attending the Sonoma County Museum gala. >> On AUGUST, first, which was a time to be had. It was a very fun. So shout out to the Sonoma County Museum. >> Thank you very much. Any other reports by council? All right. I like the pace removing at tonight, folks. We will go to public comment than any member the public wish to comment. Looking in chambers seeing non if you're online, raise your hand or dial star
9. Lauren, is anybody online who wishes to comment? Surprisingly, no. Mayor. Thank you, Lauren. All right. Move on. Then to our consent Let's see. We have to consent items. This is a I a memorable meeting. >> Items 13 when I was 13.1 13.2 looking to council. Are there any questions on either of these items seeing none that will go to public Any members of public in chambers wish to comment on consent. >> Seeing none. We'll go online if you're online and you want to make any comments, raise your hand or dial star 9. >> MADAM Zoom host, anybody online. >> We do indeed. Mayor. >> For the second week in a let's let's haven't worn. >> All right. So we have guessed 8, 3, 0, 9, via phone. Going to enable your permissions. You're going to have 2 minutes. And go ahead
and start. >> Give one moment. >> Good start whenever you're ready. >> Hello there. How are you? >> We are. Well, you have 2 minutes. >> I think I might have pressed the wrong button. I I was actually going to wait until the end of the meeting comment about the construction on West 3rd and I don't want to mess up what you guys got going right now. >> waiver, that's perfect public comment non agenda matters. At the end of the meeting and we can we can take this comment that. Mayor. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Want to clear, we will close public comment and would see. We Vice from ocean all move items. 13.1 in submitted by staff to a motion a second, but MR. Alvarez. MADAM City clerk call the vote whenever you're ready. >> Thank you. Mayor
Councilmember Rogers. Councilmember MacDonald is absent. Councilmember Fleming absent councilmember Ben Willows. Yes, councilmember, however, as Vice Mayor Okrepkie, I MAY or stab yes. The motion passes with 5 affirmative votes. >> Thank you very much. All right. So we are not yet. 5 o'clock we're going to do is we're going to condense our our our usual to public comments on non agenda matters into one at the end of the at the end of tonight's meeting. But that will allow us to go forward and take item 15.1. Our first report on our pros designation program application authorization. We have a housing focused meeting tonight. Thank you very much to our team. And missed Nicholson to MISS Jones. Welcome. >> Thank you, mayor members of the council. So as I Mark Wilson gets the power point
presentation up. I was just going to give us a a quick little introductions. I'm Jessica Jones, deputy director of planning the item before you is the city's draft. How Pro housing designation program application. So as you will recall, this is our second round of this. And we did this 3 years ago. The program is to the hcd once designated it last for 3 years. Hc establish this program back in 2021. And it's it supports jurisdictions that really go above and beyond and housing policy and acceleration of housing production. And once designated the jurisdiction has the opportunity to be and and priority for processing of new funding and available additional points for funding moving forward for housing development. So Sacramento was actually the first jurisdiction to receive her housing designation back in
2022. And and the city applied for and received our designation and 2023. And at that time in the list of jurisdictions that had gotten the per housing designation we were very excited to tied for 4th place in kind of the ranking of the number of points. So just to kind of put in perspective, the minimum point total that you need to be designated 30 points. The points that we got last time was 57 and Sacramento at that time had 64. So we are right in there with some of these bigger jurisdictions like Sacramento, San Francisco and Santa Monica. So we're very excited about that. Really just the amount of work that the city has done from a policy and development standpoint for for moving housing forward. So now fast forward 3 years. And it's time for us to do this again. So any is going to be going over the application that we put
together. We are currently in the public outreach phase of that. And as it's been drafted up, we we've got about 89 points, which annual going to, which is 32 more points than we had the last time. And again, it really is just emphasizing the amount of continued work that the city is doing from again, a policy and a streamlining perspective to move housing along here in the city. If get accepted for those 89 points, which we expect that we will, that would put in second or 3rd place of 74 jurisdictions within the county or sorry next county within the state that have this designation and well above the other jurisdictions with in Sonoma County, which of those designated here in Sonoma County, they all have less than 50 Again, just really emphasizing the incredible work that we're doing here. So, Ali, that that happy to
answer any questions on those numbers as we move forward and then handed over to Amy for the full presentation. Thank you so much. And good afternoon, mayor and council members. Deputy Director Jones mentioned the purpose of today's presentation is to bring forward and a resolution for the council's authorization to submit a new pro housing designation application to the state. And this will allow the city to maintain its pro housing designation, which expires JANUARY of next year. The other purpose of this meeting is to announce that the public review period is starting now. So there is a 30 day window where the public can read review, the draft application and provide any comments for consideration. As was previously mentioned, the big benefit of this designation is to increase the city's competitiveness and receiving
grants. So that includes both. Competitive grants that all jurisdictions can compete for that support, affordable housing projects. But it also allows the city to compete for a pool of money that is only available to pro housing jurisdictions. And then finally, this helps to demonstrate Sanders's commitment to supporting housing for all income levels within our community. When the program was first established in 2021, it. Was a pilot. So is a new program that the state began offering and it was intended to morph over time. And so there have been some changes to the program requirements. Those 2 items are highlighted here on the slide. But one of those new requirements is a formalized public participation process. And the other is that jurisdictions document, they're homeless encampment practices. I will note that
those are just baseline application requirements. So there are no additional points awarded for those 2 new requirements. Just to spend a moment on the progress made sense. The city initially received this designation and 2023 you'll see here a list of ordinances or long-range plans as well as development cost reductions that this council has advanced are supported. That allowed the city to achieve approximately 30 additional points just over that three-year period. And in the last year, the council has adopted ordinances to allow for missing middle housing and walkable parts of the city as well as tiny homes on wheels on single-family properties, which is seen as a much lower cost of housing for many within our community. We've continued to streamline the review of various multifamily projects. As well as it take a look at how dense certain
areas of the city are planned for in alignment with updates to our north stationary, a specific plan as well as establishing our South Center is a specific on the development, cost reduction inside the council adopted a capital facility fee pilot program waiver for 100% affordable housing projects and 2024. And also a 50% cost reduction for permit fees for affordable housing developments. A few notes on the public participation process. This presentation to council serves as one of those milestones to just produce awareness within the community that there is a public draft available for comment. And then there's also targeted outreach with various different housing stakeholders who has staff is directly in contact with to receive any comments that they MAY have. At the end of the public review period. Those comments
will be considered and as appropriate they can be included in the application and then at the conclusion of that, it will be sent to hcd for verification and a formal conclusion from the state prior to JANUARY of next year. So this slide shows the scoring framework that Deputy Director Jones previously mentioned. There are only 30 points required for the designation and the city currently looks to be receiving about 89 points. Again, Hcd still needs to verify this. But I will mention that staff has been working closely with their technical assistance team in putting together this application. There are 4 different categories and these are broken out in detail in attachment one in your or to the staff report. One category that the city receives points for is it related to land use and I'm an example of a land
use policy that awards the city additional points is additional density bonus being allowed in our North Station area in our downtown station area above what state law requires. Another category is related to the acceleration of housing production. So you've heard a lot about how staff has moved forward with streamlining the review of a variety of housing projects. One example is a very large multi-family projects can go through the review process process in a period of 4 months or less. On the development cost reductions side and example, which previously references the waiver of capital facility fees for 100% affordable housing projects and then and that and that financial subsidies category had this was primarily documented from our housing and community Services team, which is here and available to answer any
questions. But one example in this category is the regular use of funding to preserve affordable units that are at risk of conversion to market rate. As so. With that, the planning and economic Development Department recommends that the council received this report and any public comment as part of the public participation process and then by resolution authorize staff to submit the renewal application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development. And we are happy to answer any questions. Thank you very much. And thanks for the incredible amount of work that that it takes 2 to actually put forward these applications to say nothing policy work behind the scenes. >> Looking to council for questions right now. We have we have time to kill folks. Vice Mayor start us off. Thank you so much. Like the
presentation. Can you remind me what the at the state level are for having this designation? >> Thank you for the question. Mike There are numerous Graham's that all jurisdictions can compete for, but the city receives both priority processing and hire point totals for any type of affordable housing developments that could be tough. And the production of new housing units to preserver rehabilitate units and also to support infrastructure projects for those affordable housing projects. And then in addition, there's a set aside pool of money that is only available to pro housing jurisdictions that the city has been successful in receiving. In previous cycles and our housing team can speak to that for more details on those numbers. >> got to necessary. That's all great. And good for us.
But we receive any control back for doing what's right by housing. According to the state. >> We do not. That is not benefit of this designation. Ok? Thank Meanwhile, us. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you for the presentation. >> I you know, I think great that we it looks like we weren't doing nothing but improving by getting more and more points. I think that's excellent. I just had a question. In looking at the staff report I was looking at that belittles tiny section analysis in it. Talked No state housing law requirements. And at that, they that we have to also meet a range of income levels. And that's an area that I'm really interested terms of housing with because we talk about affordable housing. We of course, it, which will see in the next item. Lots of market rate housing. And in this in
this Chris, you go through the middle missing middle and and the duplexes in the tiny homes and all of that. That is all wonderful. But I'm just wondering the area that I'm interested in besides affordable housing, whatever that means are the folks that don't qualify for low-income housing because they make a little too much. But they can't really afford market rate. So those people are the peace people to me, I'm one of them who are in in the bottom low-mid And and I and I think they get it. They we get forgotten. So when they talk about a range of income levels, what what does that mean? Do you in terms of how applies to this application? Thank you for the question. Councilmember. >> My understanding is it. >> Is referencing the various income levels that are defined under the regional housing needs allocations. So that
would be >> very low, low moderate and then above moderate income. And those are each. >> Bracketed by percentages of area median income. >> And so >> This. Application and the policies within it described various different strategies to support. >> Each at each of those income categories. But there are any that are really specific to say moderate income. >> Household in particular, it's it can be brought and talk about encouraging housing production for really all income levels. >> Or in some cases, especially on that financial subsidy side. It more specific to the lower income residents and households. >> Andy Field At this point we we are building enough low-income. Then if that's if that's what they want us to
focus on more than I don't agree with that. I think we should be looking at books. But if that's what they want us to do. You all feel I should say you personally, but you all feel is that meeting that need by, you know, having the 89 points. So I think into the points and the application are really looking at kind of the >> broader policy work in streamlining that the city is done. I your questions can speak more to the arena, the regional housing numbers that we have to meet. And so as it stands right now, we almost met all of our market rate needs for arena we are doing pretty well. I'm on the low and very low. And there's still, you know, lots of work that we need to do. And we are continuously working on that where we have struggled were struggling with this cycle and we have struggled with past cycles is with that moderate
income. And so, you know, we are looking, you know, on our end, all policy work that we're doing and what we're talking to developers and what can we do to help incentivize that that moderate income, which I think kind of speaks more to what what your question is. So it's something that we continuously work on. It's a challenging one. And we hear that from developers of that's a really challenging. Want to meet. Thank you. Thank you. Other questions. >> All right. Just a couple for and kaelie to make you make you get up again. But kind of curious what's what is the the total was the total amount of grant awards that we received or are we got the 9 and a half million a few years ago for rides to site work downtown. Is the pot larger than that? >> Thank you for that question. County Kuykendall Housing Services manager. So
directly related to this pro housing. Designation that received the city was awarded 1.2, 5 million dollars. And that was appropriated by the council in APRIL. So city has received other funding for affordable housing, but specifically related to this pro housing designate resignation is the 1.2 5 million. >> That's helpful. So that 9.5 million just to refresh my memory. That was that wasn't directly related pro housing, but they it was taken into account as a result of that. That grant decision is calling for a few years ago. Is that accurate? We received some additional funds. We weren't expecting. Megan in my making things too complex here. Kelly, sort of put you on the spot. >> Good evening, Megan passenger, housing and Community Services director. I believe the 9 million dollars
you're referring to is an infill infrastructure grant that the city was awarded. That was with the encouragement of Hcd was specifically for downtown centric properties and specifically the garage located on 3rd Street. We also have benefited from some other infill infrastructure grants and that aren't directly related to pro housing, but do have points associated with some of the efforts that we've undertaken in the past years. And those are probably pushing about 30 million dollars for a compilation of projects throughout the downtown area. That's helpful. Thank you. >> And what is the what is the total pool of funds that is that is exclusive to cities at the Pro housing designation. We know that I can reflect back in the England number. >> The last round of funding when the city was awarded was just a little over 8 Million.
So it's a very competitive funding pool with relatively limited resources. So we received 1.2, 5, about 8 million that was available. 8 million statewide. Yes. That was the last funding round. >> All right. So let me ask Vice mayor is question. And and and in a slightly nicer way. So where it has been, I'm sure the state is heard much from cities with the pricing designation that they we go through the work and you go through the work to put together 170 page grant applications say nothing of all the policy where all the other POWs who were behind the scenes. And yet that has not to date been taken into account when it comes to decisions of local control. We're not to foist first voiced this complaint. Are there even? At the state level that they might they might be interested treating for housing studies done
differently, especially given of actual pool of funds in reward for all this work is relatively small. >> Has an excellent question. And I have not heard of any murmurings, but I would love to hear rings moving forward. >> This has been brought up with at least our Cal Cities lobbyist. I'm sure you been in the year of a lot of folks, the state level 2. But again, to the point of the vice mayor made it is it's it's interesting. It's interesting. This is not been taken into account given all of the housing legislation that's that's been dropped on top of cities, especially cities like a lot like ours and made every effort to be good actors in terms of housing development. All all. And my question, is there nothing else from council? All right. Let's open up to the public again. If you're online, raise your hand or press star 9, but we'll
start in chamber and MR. Farron. >> Mayor and mayor and members of the council. Let me try to answer that a little differently. As you know, I'm one of your appointees the housing authority. And yesterday. As the Housing Authority's subcommittee on the implementation of a No for that. We have out. I learned that that 1.2 5 million plus some money from the infrastructure long ago is going to help us probably fund portions of 2 very, very focused low-income projects. So we're going to get some more housing for the 50%, 60%. Not a I don't personally consider 80% of Emi anywhere near affordable. And I want to remind you that this state has 2 categories below 30%. Very low and slow and moderates all great. But the state recognizes extremely low and acutely which is the projects I used to work on. Okay. So
I'm a little I will defer a little with Jennifer about whether or not we're really, really doing our. It's for very low and even the lower than that. And I recognize that we're not doing our full bid for moderate, but I want you to remember that if I were in your shoes, I would have asked Kelly Megan tell you a little more about what that might mean for the 30 million you're trying to get for the the second phase of kid. Karen, U.S.. Yeah. The little pots to even give you a She certainly showed, but soon that Santa Rosa is in the leadership statewide for the Little But I think the state is going to begin to think about. Rewarding those pro housing designations for the bigger pots. And I'm particularly looking at home, keep less. Gregory, thank you. Anybody else in chambers wish to comment? >> Seeing none. We'll go
online. Lauren. Anybody with their hands and raised online. >> No mayor, not even a false alarm. This time. >> Thank you, Lauren. Alright, we'll close public comment and I'll bring it back to council any any final discussion. All right, then then MISTER Rogers of looking for a motion. >> Thank you for side. Just like to thank staff for all their hard work. Even if sometimes you don't see the fruits of the labor directly. Thank you for jumping through the hoops and all the hard they do. And with that, I'd like make a motion to adopt resolution as presented by staff. >> We have a motion and a second by MISTER Alvarez. MADAM City Clerk, you can call vote whenever you're ready. >> Thank you, Mayor Councilmember Rogers, Councilmember MacDonald in Fleming, her absent councilmember Ben Willows.
Yes, Councilmember Alvarez, Vice Mayor Okrepkie. I mayor stab yes. The motion passes with 5 affirmative votes. Thank you very much. And and Jessica, thank you again for all the work he staying. Are you staying around for our next item? Both of them. >> Amy, you get to you get to depart. Thank. Thank you again. More on item 15 point to a report on high-density multi-family residential incentive program. MR. Osborne will join Thank you both. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Mayor and members of the council, Jessica Jones, deputy director of planning again so the item before you is the high-density multi-family residential incentive program. This program was originally adopted by council in 2018 it was designed to incentivize downtown housing development. And and it supports the council goals of Economic development and housing for
all. The item before you tonight is consideration of extension of that program by 5 years that time would allow city staff to develop an updated impact. Fee study engage with the community developers and ultimately adopt an updated program. In the short term staff will be looking at putting together a study session for council likely towards the end of fall beginning of winter. We're going to be looking for more robust conversation on our existing fee incentives and receive hopefully receive some guidance from council on an overall approach. So in 2016, the city embarked on a major, major effort to address the housing crisis. And that included a presentation and analysis looking at development and tax revenue which is presented to council by Urban 3, which is the planning and economic from. That analysis provided
economic data supporting higher density development in the downtown area. That same year council adopted the Santa Rosa Housing Action Plan. And that looked at strategies to boost housing supply, expand affordable housing and streamline residential development. In 2018. The council adopted program that we're talking about tonight. And then in 2019, there corrections made to 2 of the resolutions adopted the program to identify and matchup eligible zoning districts within our downtown. In Twenty-twenty, the council adopted an update to the downtown stationary specific plan that original specific plan was adopted in 2007, the update looked at providing new tools to facilitate high and facilitate high-density Mixed use residential commercial in our downtown. And then due to the ongoing housing crisis and to support the anticipated
projects in downtown that we're hoping to utilize the incentive program in 2022, the council extended the program by 3 years. And that program is now set to expire at the end of this month. So the purpose of the program is to encourage unit housing development at all, affordability levels with increased 10 cities in the downtown area through reduction and deferral fees in these reductions include reductions to the capital facilities. Fees also known cff production to park fees and then deferral of the payment of water and wastewater fees. And there are no reductions to those water and wastewater fees. That would be for all. So slight provides an example of what the fees would be both with and without the incentive program. The incentive program provides reduction and slide. We've what it looks like
without it in the yellow. What it would look like with it for market rate project in the orange and then what it would look like for a project that would provide onsite inclusionary housing in the blue. And so this this example is looking at project that would be in the core mixed use zoning district, which is really the central area of our downtown. And it wouldn't looking at a project that would be at least 4 stories in height with at least 3 floors dedicated to residential use. And for the purposes of this program, when we talk residential floors, it means that it would have at least 25% of Glos gross floor area dedicated to habitable space. So this case we're looking at a 7 story to enter 66 unit, residential building. The first 2 floors have less than 25% dedicated to residential. So the incentive program would start after floor 5. So for
floor 6, 7, they would not be charged. Fees. Cff were park fees. And then if the project were to provide onsite affordability again, that's the blue column here in for our downtown. When we talk about meeting our inclusionary housing ordinance, that would onsite production at 4%. The low income or 3% for very low income for rent project or at least 5% moderate income units free for sale project. And for that, the fees would be further reduced to $2 per square foot. So as I mentioned, the program provides of option for deferral of water and wastewater fees. And there are 2 options for that. The first is deferral of payment until after 75% occupancy of all residential units or 6 months from the final inspection, whichever comes sooner. And then option 2 would be a 5 plan at 5 equal installments subjects to interest. So since
it in 2018, there have been a number of projects of taking advantage of the program which we've shown here on this slide completed projects include the Cannery Pullman laughs, 8, 8, 8, 4 street and the Felix. And we also have 3 projects that are currently pending that are hoping to use this program. And that includes Avenue 3.20, apartments, the 3rd phase of the Pullman laughs, the project and the humble Stu Street Apartments at 4.25. Humble. So looking at next steps. So as for tonight, as I mentioned, we are recommending that the council extend the program for an additional 5 years and that would run through AUGUST 31st of 2031. This additional time, as I mentioned, will allow for that overall discussion of an overall approach to impact fees. It would allow us time to engage community members and developers and develop an updated impact. Fee study
following that the program would be amended obviously brought back to council for final action. In the meantime, the residential projects, including those that are currently pending that I mentioned would be able to continue taking advantage of the current program. So with that, the planning and economic development Department is recommending that the council by 3 resolutions amends the project to add those 5 years. And I discussed to 2031 and we're happy to answer any questions. Thank you both. Again, lots of work behind Bring you back to council for questions. >> We have 15 minutes. Everyone. Thank. Thank you. It's been winless. >> Thank you, Thank you for the just off the top, of course, support this completely. Love to see incentives because that's what we're out. Always asked about
when we're on the community. Why are we offering more incentives even though we already are? People think we're not offering enough. So all of that is good. I was just curious about the impact fee study >> or doing the updated it? Is that something that staff will do or do you have a consultant do that or how does that get done over Whatever time period you have. You're looking at. >> Yes, thank you. Councilmember Gabe director of planning and economic development typically and it's referred to as a nexus fee study and what it does is anytime you have an impact fee. It determines the projects that you're attempting to fund with that impact fee and then a proportionate share that new development pace. So it's it's really a very lengthy review on better understanding what the fee program is attempting
to cover and how it's delivering private projects to the community parks its new park space eff. It's typically new projects that are in the infrastructure arena. So it's a staff, heavy exercise and it usually is supported by consulting assistance to handle the technical documents makes it a bit more defensible. There's a lot of regulations that go along with Nexus fee study. So it brings that level of expertise and we have discussed that for quite sometime. We can actually leverage the existing funds that exist in the few programs to cover this. That's an allowable expenditures. So it doesn't necessarily have a general fund impact to do so. And we should be doing that on a regular time frame anyway. So as fee studies age, they naturally need to be refreshed. We are getting to the point where Cff and parks is on the same track. So we've
been looking at a target date and working with our city manager's office on how to better understand the purchase ation of that as it does affect multiple departments and the collaboration of that fee study. >> Just one other thought did on the in terms of incentives. I I suman hit. Use that word. But a super pac that you all have talked to developers and other folks about whether or not the like these incentives are that these will actually incentivize them to 2 built because especially with this chart on slide 7. Can see that's primarily market rate housing that were to you here. And I know we're talking about mostly downtown and not. I guess what I'm thinking about is and I been talking about this last few meetings. What we do to incentivize more low income housing, whether it's low low or low income housing and moderate housing. Make,
you know, make it pencil out. Because I do feel like. There is a large percentage of folks here that ERs are stuck in certain types of environments because they can't get to the place where they can save money to move into market rate housing. And, you know, I know that my my district is I always say it's it's working class. I'm working And I know when I talk to folks that that's where they feel they feel stuck. So I just want to make sure an advocate for that that that we find ways to do that. And I know that's not necessarily here, but clearly just with that, what we've been doing great developments. i love the Felix and all of those things. But I think we really need to focus on people who really live here, you know, and families, especially there's not, you know, they can reserve wonderful project. I think it is fabulous, but not enough of of things of
that nature. So. Thank you. Printed you want to respond or are we moving on? I can respond very quickly. And I think that's an incredibly important point. >> We have Dunphy programs in the past that are very spoke, focused on a specific development type. And I think the downtown as prime example incentivize housing downtown, we also cff program that attempts to incentivize affordable housing. What our goal is towards the end of the year. When we come back to the council is to understand what a comprehensive incentive package looks like to support housing in general and taking feedback on the various housing types to understand how applied at the downtown. So we are able to tie that into the fee study instead of the one-off programs that have different timelines, having a more robust discussion about how we can potentially track
with our reena numbers, but understand what really the community needs and how does the few played a role in that and what incentive package look like? But I think it's incredibly important point and we will be having that conversation later in the Thank you. Other questions. Just one for to the list of projects that have have come through since implementing especially pilot program. Impressive. >> To what extent can we draw a correlation? How many of these projects would not have happened if we hadn't provided to our impact fee incentives. And conversely, do we have a sense of how many projects are not happening primarily due city impact fees? All of us get earful on a regular basis. That's hard to suss out what the real, what the real impact is, what the correlation is from. From your perspective, you a sense of either how
effective this program has been in spring. New direct new development and how much more effective we might be if if we tweak our impact fees again. >> Thank you, mayor. It is a little difficult to determine. I think downtown in particular, we developed a fairly comprehensive program involves streamlined permit review involved predictability in the process. Consistency with the downtown station area plan and the scene of incentive on top of that. And what I can state is that that package really put downtown Santa Rosa on a different map as far as attracting development. That interest came, we move that forward and ultimately resulted in development. There were also other pots of money that came into the equation to help close the funding gap. I think it is very difficult for development to really pin down one specific fee category.
That will be the catalyst to move it forward. Typically, especially with market rate housing is very dependent on the rants. The cost of construction often works against things. It's going We are very similar to San Francisco in cost of construction, but very different in San Francisco in rents. And that's one of the challenges. So oftentimes what developers are attempting to do is close the gap. And then they look at the various fee items and oftentimes the fees don't necessarily provide an immediate benefit to the development. They're looking at infrastructure. Long-term service fees do provide an immediate benefit because they're bringing staff into making sure permits approved quickly. So oftentimes impact fees do get identified by the development community simply because it they don't necessarily see it as a
necessary line item in their overall costs. And that becomes the focus of the flip side of that is a very important fee for developing infrastructure and really bouncing out building communities opposed to simply building housing and communities. That's a critical component to balancing that out. So really what the department attempts to do is better understand construction costs better really learned what the gap is and how we can close it through other creative ways to really avoid the hyper focus on the fees because I don't think it's simple to say that if we way fees, it produces development. And I think the cff pilot waiver for affordable housing is a prime example of that. We did. Actually that's council took a very aggressive approach to 0 that fee out. We have not seen any development take advantage of that. It MAY
in the future because it MAY help to close that funding gap, but it doesn't necessarily produce immediate results. Very helpful answer. And I like your comparison of building homes versus building communities. >> That's a that's a helpful clarification. Where do we stand on the spectrum of impact fees is statewide and then potentially nationwide were is Rose there where we super expensive are we kind in the middle? Where we stand? >> I would say generally what happens is as costs increase agencies will redo their fee study and fees at a Tennessee go up because of the increase in cost. So essentially it creates this leapfrogging process where jurisdictions can be high and then all of a sudden they're low based on other jurisdictions adjusting their We did our last fees study typically what happens is there is this exercise. You
determine a maximum fee that can be collected and then that fee is oftentimes lowered based on how the market can digest that feat. So it's brought down to account for how much that fee is. Percentage wise of the development. So typically that exercise in most jurisdictions go through that naturally causes them to level out a bit. Really what's happened specifically with legislation that's come through as it focuses on the proportionality of that fee. So as unit sizes decrease the fusion decrease along with that agencies have often fee based on the door. So a residential unit no matter the size pays the certain rate. So we're seeing a lot of jurisdictions go through that process and that is bringing it down. And Santa Rosa does its next fee study. We will look at that proportionality as well. And it will likely cause a lower
fee for some of the smaller units. So I think on average center roses competitive, there's areas for the smaller units where that fee can come down to approve the proportionality. But really what I do see is because of costs, anytime a city goes through a nexus study unless there's reductions incentives that bring that down just naturally concert construction costs want to raise that fee because of what's intended to be covered with that >> Thank you again, helpful, right? Final question for me to get and goes back to a comment. You made her where you underlined that a number of incentive programs or policy changes at the city made. I'm going I'm guessing you're talking about winner of the renewal Enterprise district as well. Some of that some of things we put into place their trust. We're tracking a different class of
developer, a different category developer, referring to related California is and then bla Housing's. Is that where r is it art or the larger players coming here because of this does range of incentives or assistance that we're that we provided. I think that's a correct statement. Really when we went through this exercise many years ago of figuring out how we can get higher density in downtown. >> The staff understood that it is a different type of developer that does that. And that developer will often work in a market that produces the highest profit. So the Bay Area, San Francisco, obviously we've seen a lot there. So really a lot of those efforts started putting Santa Rosa on the map as a potential. And we have seen a number of those developers that go with more of the higher-density projects build up focus on downtown
development. We have seen them actually invest in Santa Rosa. So now that concept needs to be proved out as far as how successful those projects are. But we are seeing an interest in it really is a steady interest in many of these opportunities sites in downtown Santa Rosa, as well as Santa Rosa's, a whole. And it really is a different class of developer that moves forward and takes on those types of projects. >> Thank you. And is that class a developer? Are they a little less sensitive to impact fees? I here last in relation to their projects them to do with some of the, you know, with some of the more regional players. >> I think oftentimes those developers factor that in, they understand they're used to dealing with different jurisdictions that have equally or higher fees. So that's worked into the program
before the concept of developing on the site even comes into the mix. They often also understand the benefit of those few types because they are really in the long game. Many of those developers will hold properties for a lengthy period of time. Those fees or returned back to the community in the form of infrastructure and usually in growth. So it builds out parks. Builds out roadway network. So it's really making the environment and the community around that site better and oftentimes developer see the value and those moneys folk flowing back to the community for that purpose. >> Thank you. Hopeful again. All right. No more questions for me. Let's open it up to the public. We'll start in chambers comments. But if you are online, raise your hand or press star 9. Anybody in chambers wish to make comment on this item. MR. Farron
nothing. All right. Good. Good, good. We knew we needed to burn a few more minutes here. Gregory, any select mayor. >> I don't think he should think that you're only attracting the rich developers. I mean, sure, they're going to come when they see You know, a real opportunity. But I want you to understand that. Building something takes a lot of money up front. It takes a big, huge bank behind you are takes real success in your past. Smaller developers who don't have that cash flow who interest. I mean, who would rather put the money in their own staff to come down? Talk to You know, our staff then pay an incentive fee or, you know something early delay of your fees is helping a lot of middle income developers and you should recognize that. >> I think you Gregory Lauren, anybody online.
>> We air. We are going start with guest 8, 3, 0, 9. You're going to have 2 minutes. To me. One moment. And we're going to enable your permissions. Go ahead whenever you're ready. You MAY have to unmute yourself. Guest 8 threes or 9. There we there you go. >> Mayor and Councilmembers. Thanks for taking my call. I'm a concerned who's living over here West 3rd in Fulton. And I'm here and a lot great talk. Of development. I love it. It sounds great. It's excellent. And a lot of discussion about contractors and impact fees and stuff like that. But I'm wondering. I have there been any studies on the impact. Of the neighborhoods. Of the people these low-income facilities are being located. Any studies. On stuff like that. But how it effects. The people in the neighborhoods. And I I. I do have compassion. For the homeless and
low-income housing. I understand it. I get it. And I'm hearing a lot about development in the downtown But here at West 3rd they are building a. They just broke ground and are getting ready to pour. Concrete. And it's going to be house women. Clean living the facility. And it's going to be a 10 bedroom. The facility. Will impact this neighborhood so much. Just adamant about talking to my neighbors and friends in the area. We're already dealing with the homeless. Problem at a place to play park, which is just right adjacent to this, the facility that you're going to be building. The place to play Park is. Somewhat unsafe after the goes down. >> Thank you, Sir. Lauren, are there any other online comments? >> We, too, are moving on to gust to 9, 3, 0, 3. If there's anyone else, please raise your hand or hit star 9. Guest, 9,
3, 0, 3, I've been able permissions. Go right ahead. They left mayor. >> Thank you very much. So no more online comments, correct? All right. We will close online com or a close public comment. Bring you back for any final comments or discussion from council Rodgers. Did you have comment? >> Yes, thank you, mayor. I just wanted to say that I believe we need housing for everyone. So when you say affordable. Housing, it really is what people can afford. I hear councilmember in Wales, but really what happens is if we don't have the middle the middle housing that people that can afford a little bit more. Stay stuck in that. And what is available for the middle housing. So it makes it difficult for people. That's all they can afford. So having incentives and programs like this, I think is very and important. But we also need
places like the Felix in different places for people that can afford it so that they can get what they desire and what they want. So they don't stay in that middle housing income bracket. I think that's very important. But we do have people in Santa Rosa that have all different types of income levels. And so we do need to have a variety of housing for for everyone in that I feel like sometimes we go. We need very low. >> And we need we need middle, but we don't need high, but we do because we have people that enjoy that. We have people that come up to me and say thank you so much for having this downtown. We really need it. >> This is so great. I can walk to restaurants. I can do this. I can do that. So I think we just need to keep it in perspective. When we look at housing, we have an array of income levels here in Santa
Rosa and we need something that appeals. >> To all of those levels. >> Thank you. Any other comments from council? All right, that I'm looking or in motion and sees and Wales. >> Yes, thank you, Mayor. I move that we adopted 3 resolutions as presented by staff and waive reading of the text. So yeah. >> All right. We have a motion and in their second from stronger city clerk, you can call the vote when every >> Thank you, Mayor Councilmember Rogers, I. Councilmember MacDonald in Fleming are absent councilmember Ben Willows. Yes, councilmember, however, as our Vice Mayor Okrepkie, I mayor Stapp. Yes. The motion passes with 5 permitted votes. >> Thank you very much. All right. We're close to the end. Call the public's attention to item 71 and gave. Jessica, thank you so much. Thank you
for that. Thank you for that item. Our cold call the public's attention item. 17.1. Our notice of final map. See you can even find information online. We're going to go to our our first and only public comment on non agenda matters this evening. Normally have to. We are at a very efficient meeting tonight. So that we're down to one. Are there any members of the public in council chambers and wish to make comment on any items not listed on the agenda. I see that there Let's see Flores, let's start with you. And then we'll move on to John Clays. >> Good Evening Council recently constituents have expressed concerns regarding your leadership, particularly with preppy because the trial is taking place for former Windsor Mayor Dominic Foppoli, but is facing multiple rape allegations. Was not brought to my attention until recently that COUNCILMAN Up to father
was on the council alongside Mister Foppoli at the time MR. Okrepkie was highly involved. An act of 2030 club. So I'm not sure why there's been really no mention of that in the media. So I'm mro was involved in any events. Christopher Creek Winery, the reason I'm concerned is because was means the trial. These incidents took place a boys and girls club events. George Peterson copies they provide insurance to boys and girls club. I'm litigating with the club right now because over 40 on documented, boys were raped and trafficked and the Predators doing 150 years state prison. However, they're saying I made all this up so I find that very I also didn't know until I read Craig Keys, fathers today for a little sirs that Brousseau Crappie was the board PRESIDENT At Boys and Girls Club. So. This is very concerning because a lot of
politicians run in the same circles like with Terry Sanders, who's also running for council right now and MR. Sanders was going to utilize Mark Adams of White Star group to hold is listening session up. Gentleman's very close colleague of MISTER Okapi. So Mark Adams offered me money to throw my lawsuit with Boys and Girls Club. That story I was on the cover, the press Democrat on Saturday. So none of this sits well with me and I hope we get more answers during the foppoli hearing. GOD bless you. Thank you so much. >> Thank you. John. And if there are other members of the public who wish to a curated to podium is now to save time. John, Go ahead. >> Yes, I have been a resident here for since 2010 and I'm here to talk about the ever-popular graffiti abatement. I'm here on behalf anti Blight ordinance. 3, 6,
0, 1, 3, 7, to 9. I'd first like to bring our attention to the fellow Belleview area neighborhood wall back into the one-on-one North Freeway on highway. 101, north of Todd Avenue. Sorry. I certainly have had the concern for many years that is adding blight to the area. It's the gateway to Santa Rosa, in my opinion, from all areas south. >> And it Not going to win any awards for people who are visiting here for the first time and see that we don't take that section of the one-on-one seriously. I'm aware that it is private property. And I've been told that it not an H.O.A. And I think we should do something about it. It's not a Caltrans issue. Because we've done little about this blight. >> We now have on the east side of the one-on-one, an area that backs to the Santa Rosa Apartments that are brand new.
>> Another area on the wall that has been hit and for at least 3 months now we've done nothing about that. In my opinion. I don't believe the owner even knows. I know that we reporting platform here in Santa Rosa, but it's very difficult to access. I'm concerned that this is moving north. This graffiti on the one on one. I personally remove graffiti on the backside of the dog. I care clinic near Steele Lane last week. It is now on the backside of the Wells Fargo Bank facing the one on one. We need to to put some energy into this. >> John, thank you. And at our city manager right now. Do we have the are areas on our radar screen? We have the information for them. >> So appreciate you highlighting them for us. I think we are aware of that. And there are areas that we'd like to try to continue to
work with the to abate address. I think our director of planning and I thought about when will come up and just make sure we contact information to circle back. >> We're not come back and forth right now, but we will get your information. Thank you, sir. And and a shout out to the Promise Center. Local faith community doing a lot to help the city and our graffiti team deal with the situations. Alright, next, public comment, MR. Fix Welcome to council Chambers >> Good afternoon Council members. My name is Brian Fix and I'm here to represent the Santa Rosa Police Officers Association. I'm here today to address the measure q tax measure, which was recently voted on and placed on the NOVEMBER 2026. Ballot. After a great deal of discussion and debate amongst our membership. I stand here today to vocalize the peel away support and
endorse the tax measure. To be Frank. This was not an easy decision to come to. But what helps way our decision to support this measure was acknowledging the cities effort to make financial changes and to make tough decisions to implement cuts and reduced spending citywide over the past 2 years. While we're not thrilled to take 9 cuts in the process. We understand that the police department had to do its part in these dire economic times. After sitting through countless budget discussions and meetings. It is clear to us that there is no alternative path forward other than asking our community for support and to present them with the choice of voting to support or oppose this tax measure. The Santa Rosa Police Officers Association wants to continue to support the city into remain loyal to the community that we so proudly
served. We hope that the community will join us in supporting this tax measure so that we can continue to see the city grow and to improve for generations to come. >> Brian, thank you. And thanks to the p and as our pd. Are there any other members of the public in council chambers who wish to speak? Seeing none. We'll go online. Please raise your hand and All-Star 9, if you're online and you wish to make comment on any items, not on the agenda. MADAM Zoom clerk, are there any questions? Are there any hands raised online? >> We We have one mayor. Perfect. Thank >> Guest 8, 3, 0, 9, and going able your permission joint. 2 minutes. As soon as you unmute yourself. >> Hello there, councilmember to me again. I was talking earlier about the impact. The homeless shelter that's going to be built on West 3rd
Fulton. We're already dealing with someone of homeless crisis over at the park. That's very close to this facility. There has been uptick with the building of fence for the construction site. We've already seen an uptick in graffiti. This just from one week of the defense being put up for this facility. The impact of this facility on the neighborhood is. Very, very, very heavy and All of the homeless people from the place to play Park. Will now come to this. It's going to bring trash. Throughout a lot of traffic in this that cul-de-sac that will be leading into facility. Not only that. But the stress and the impact of this facility. Nobody. Everybody that I've talked to there is not one positive. The people. The only upside is that across the street is a. It's liquor. MAY have an increase in alcohol and tobacco sales, but other
than that, there is no positive things for the people of this neighborhood of having. This facility here. My question is, is there any way? That we can stop this from being built? >> I think I think my Thank you for your comments are we can't get into a discussion, but you can certainly pay attention or planning meetings and I contact the city to different time. Is there anybody else online? Learn? >> No mayor. That's the last won. All right. We're gonna close public comment on non agenda matters. And the time is 5.15, and we're officially adjourned. Thank you, everyone.